Integrations & customisation

Your engineers keep their tools. Integration is scoped around them.

Teams build years of standards and templates around their CAD and BIM software. Integration starts from your tools, versions and templates, and its scope is agreed per project.

  1. Starting pointYour drawingsPDF drawing sets, as they exist today
  2. RamerionWorkflow outputModels, data and deliverables for engineers to review
  3. DestinationYour toolchainThe CAD/BIM tools and standards your team already uses

01Philosophy

Integration starts from your tools, versions and templates.

Every team’s toolchain is different: versions, plug-ins, templates, naming conventions and file-exchange habits built up over many projects. An integration has to handle those details.

So we treat integration as engineering work in its own right. Custom integration scope depends on the target tool, version, data formats and project requirements, and it is agreed before anything is built.

Sometimes a clean file export is all a team needs. Sometimes it is an API or a purpose-built connector. We would rather recommend the simplest pathway that works than the most elaborate one.

02Possible pathways

Four ways data could move between our workflows and yours.

A From a Ramerion workflow

  • 3D model data
  • BOM & BOQ tables
  • Drawing sets
  • Component & asset data

B Pathway, scoped per project

  • File export / import
  • API access
  • Custom connector
  • Version-specific project

Direction of data flow is agreed during scoping

C Your toolchain

  • CAD / BIM authoring tools
  • PLM, ERP or asset systems
  • Document control

Versions, templates and standards stay yours

Illustrative workflowEach pathway is a possibility scoped per project — not a list of shipped native integrations.
  • Export & import pathways

    Exchange models, tables and drawings through file formats your tools can already read and write, agreed for each project.

  • API access

    Programmatic access so your own systems can request or receive data, where the deployment and use case support it.

  • Custom connectors

    A purpose-built connector or plug-in for a specific tool, scoped to the versions and workflows your team actually uses.

  • Version-specific projects

    Integration work tied to a particular tool version, template or company standard, with maintenance responsibilities agreed up front.

03Toolchains

Tools an integration may involve.

Integration conversations often start with a specific application. These are examples — not a compatibility list. Whether and how a connection is built is decided per project.

Examples of engineering tools an integration conversation may involve, and their status
ToolWorkflow areaStatus
Tekla StructuresSteel modelling, detailing and fabrication-drawing workflowsScoped on request
SOLIDWORKSMechanical parts, assemblies and drawingsScoped on request
Siemens NXProduct engineering and manufacturing workflowsScoped on request
Other 3D CAD / BIM toolsModel exchange, review and documentation workflowsScoped on request

Tool names are trademarks of their respective owners. They are listed only as examples of software an integration conversation may involve; no partnership, endorsement, certification or shipped native integration is implied.

04Scoping

What we need to scope an integration.

Bring what you have. A short description, a screenshot of the current workflow or a few sample files are enough to start the conversation.

Discuss your workflow
Integration scoping sheet
  • Tool and version

    Which applications are involved, their exact versions, and any add-ons or templates in use.

  • Supported data formats

    The file formats or interfaces each tool can import and export in your set-up.

  • Direction of data flow

    Into your tools, out of them, or both — and which system is the source of truth.

  • Expected output

    What a successful exchange produces: models, drawings, tables, metadata or reports.

  • Deployment & security constraints

    Network boundaries, hosting rules, access policies and the approvals your IT team requires.

  • Success criteria

    How your engineers will judge the result, including review steps and acceptance checks.

How we would approach it

  1. Discovery

    Understand the workflow, tools and constraints.

  2. Sample-data trial

    Test the pathway on representative files you choose to share.

  3. Engineer review

    Your team checks the output against its own standards.

  4. Agreed scope

    Deliverables, support and maintenance set out in writing.

Next step

Tell us how your team works today.

Describe the tools, versions and handoffs involved, and we will give you a straight answer on which integration pathway — if any — makes sense.